Home ] Appearance Retention Reports ] Browning Reports ] Cleaning Errors Reports ] Color Loss Reports ] Delamination Reports ] Design Flaws Reports ] Double Stick Reports ] Fading Reports ] Fuzzing Reports ] Installation Reports ] Latex Problems Reports ] Lines, Bands, & Streaks Reports ] Maintenance Reports ] Matting & Crushing Reports ] Pooling Reports ] Shedding Reports ] Side Match Reports ] Specification Reports ] Thickness & Weight Reports ] Upholstery Reports ] Water Damage Reports ] Yarn Slippage Reports ] Yellowing Reports ]


Fuzzing from Improper Vacuum Settings ] Fuzzing Defect, no test ] Fuzzing from a KneeKicker ] [ Fuzzing Should Self Correct ]


Home ]

 

Fuzzing Should Self Correct

This report  was done for the carpet mill.

THE CARPET

FIBER/ ID METHOD: Nylon-Chemical

FIBER HUE: Blue/Green

CONSTRUCTION: Tufted Cut Loop

YARN STYLE: Saxony

SQUARE YARDAGE: 72

BACK SYSTEM: Conventional Tufted

PRIMARY BACKING: Polypropylene

SECONDARY BACKING: Polypropylene

THE INSTALLATION

LOCATION TYPE: Residential

METHOD: Stretch-In

CUSHION: 1/2 Inch Rebond 4 Lb./Sq. Ft.

SUBFLOOR: HardWood

AREA INSTALLED: Living-Room, Hallway, & Two Bedrooms

USE & MAINTENANCE INFORMATION AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION

LITERATURE RECEIVED WITH PURCHASE: None Reported

TEMPERATURE: 74°F - 23.3° C RH 33%

ADULTS: 3 - CHILDREN: 4 - PET(S): 0

DO THEY SMOKE? Yes

SPOTTING AGENTS: None Reported

VACUUM/FREQUENCY: Upright Daily

ENTRY-MATS? See Report

SOIL: Slightly Soiled

HEATING TYPE: Floor Unit Gas

COOLING TYPE: None

CLEANING: Never Been Cleaned

REASON FOR COMMISSION

To determine the reason for the fuzzing.

THE REPORT

Site Conditions and Geographical Information

The carpet was located in the claimant’s free standing single story house. This house was located in a residential neighborhood in the Los Angeles Basin eight miles from the Pacific Ocean. The house was well maintained and was owner occupied at the time of the inspection.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION MADE TO THE INSPECTOR

The claimant noticed an excessive amount of carpet fuzz after the carpet was vacuumed. Concern was heightened when the children began to place fiber in their mouths.

DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM AREA BY THIS INSPECTOR

One half inch loose fuzz was noted in the trafficked areas of the installation. The heaviest problems were located in the living-room. A slight amount of fuzz was still attached to the carpet.

ON-LOCATION FIELD TESTING

The claimant’s vacuum cleaner was inspected and the setting on the brush was set for high pile. The bag was 1/4 full. There were no burrs on the head. There were beater bars on the head and the brush looked worn.

An ultra-violet light was shone throughout the installation. The result of this test revealed no reflections.

Numerous moisture tests were performed using a Delmhorst Moisture Sensor. The results of these tests revealed that there were no readings.

THE ISSUE OF THIS REPORT

The question that I have been asked to address is: what has caused the carpet to fuzz?

GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING THE ISSUE

Fuzzing, and Shedding can be caused by

1. Mill defects that can include:

  • improper encapsulation of the bundle wrap
  • improper sheering of the carpet at the mill
  • extra short sections of staple fibers

2. improper vacuuming of the carpet

3. excessive foot traffic

DEFINITIONS

According to the IICRC FLOOR COVER REFERENCE GUIDE GLOSSARY fuzzing is defined as the following:

fuzzing - Hairy appearance on a carpet's surface caused by wild fibers or slack yarn twist; or by fibers slipping out of the yarn (especially staple) as a result of routine service or cleaning. Carpet of continuous filament yarn is fuzzed by filaments snagging and breaking. It is corrected by shearing during manufacture, or by a carpet technician using a device called a micro-shear.

THE INSPECTOR'S ANALYSIS

· The moisture test revealed that there was no severe over wetting of the carpet.

· The ultra-violet light test indicates that other chemicals such as industrial strength detergents were not present.

Some loose fiber that is one quarter to one half inch long is indicative of tufted-staple-yarn and is not considered a defect in manufacturing on new carpet. The cause is from sheared ends that did not get encapsulated into the latex. Normally this condition should decrease or cease within three to six months with normal usage and maintenance. If the condition continues then there may be a problem with:

· latex penetration inherent in manufacturing

· improper maintenance inherent in vacuuming

· improper usage, such as excessive foot traffic

This carpet should be given another three months of observations to see if the problem continues. If it does then a replacement of the vacuum cleaner brush and laboratory test of latex penetration should be performed.

CONCLUSION

Shedding in the carpet in question was normal and should self correcting in time.