Home ] Appearance Retention Reports ] Browning Reports ] Cleaning Errors Reports ] Color Loss Reports ] Delamination Reports ] Design Flaws Reports ] Double Stick Reports ] Fading Reports ] Fuzzing Reports ] Installation Reports ] Latex Problems Reports ] Lines, Bands, & Streaks Reports ] Maintenance Reports ] Matting & Crushing Reports ] Pooling Reports ] Shedding Reports ] Side Match Reports ] Specification Reports ] Thickness & Weight Reports ] Upholstery Reports ] Water Damage Reports ] Yarn Slippage Reports ] Yellowing Reports ]


Pile reversal due to Tracking ] Pooling makes Rings of Dirt ] Pooling Report for Dealer ] Pooling in Residence for Consumer ] [ Pooling for a Fiber Producer ] Pooling on Cut & Loop ]


Home ]

 

Pooling for a Fiber Producer

This report was commissioned by the fiber producer.

CLAIM STATISTICS FOR THIS INSPECTION

RETAINED ON: 2/17/99

DATE INSPECTED: 2/26/99

DATE WRITTEN: 3/3/99

PHOTOGRAPHS: 1

PROBLEM REPORTED: Matting & Crushing

PROBLEM FOUND: Pile Reversal

DIAGRAM: Yes

SAMPLES: Carpet Remnant Only

PERSONS PRESENT: Inspector, Claimant, & Specifier

 

THE CARPET

STYLE NAME & NUMBER: Tapestry

FIBER Nylon

ID METHOD: According To Commissioner

FIBER COLOR Off White

CONSTRUCTION: Conventional Tuft

YARN STYLE: Cut & Loop Sculpture

SQUARE YARDAGE: 80

BACK SYSTEM: Conventional Tuft

PRIMARY BACKING: Polypropylene

SECONDARY BACKING: Polypropylene

INSTALLATION STATISTICS

TYPE LOCATION: Residential

DATE INSTALLED: 8/10/98

METHOD: Stretch-In

CUSHION: Cushion

SUBFLOOR: Concrete Slab

AREA INSTALLED: Two Bedrooms & Hallway

 

USE & MAINTENANCE STATISTICS AT THE TIME OF THE INSPECTION

LITERATURE RECEIVED WITH PURCHASE: Yes

ADULTS: 2 - CHILDREN: 0 - PET(S): 0

DO THEY SMOKE? No

SPOTTING AGENTS: Not Applicable

TEMPERATURE: 72°F - 22.2° C RH 51%

VACUUM TYPE Electra Lux Canister

VACUUM FREQUENCY: Weekly & more

ENTRY-MATS: In the Downstairs Lobby

SOIL: Occasional Spot

HEATING TYPE: Forced Air Gas

COOLING TYPE: Central - Electric

CLEANING: Never Been Cleaned

 

INSTRUCTIONS FOR THIS REPORT

Diagram the affected area, acquire a three-inch by five-inch sample of a remnant, acquire individual tufts of the affected area, and check for pile reversal.

 

Site Conditions and Geographical Information

This is an owner-occupied condominium, which was owner occupied at the time of the inspection. This home was positioned on the third floor of a secured common-interest dwelling, which was located on the cliffs across and over-looking the Pacific Ocean. A professional housekeeper was on duty at the time of the inspection. Different types of construction people were also coming and going during the inspection and remodeling was near completion. The maintenance and condition of this property was very good.

 

BACKGROUND INFORMATION MADE TO THE INSPECTOR

The installation of this carpet was part of the moving in process and information on the previous carpet was unknown. Part of the criteria of selecting this particular carpet was the aesthetics.

In a short time after the installation, an odd appearance in the yarn began to form in the hallway and two bedrooms. Vacuuming the carpet did not make the problem to go away.

 

DESCRIPTION OF PROBLEM AREA BY THIS INSPECTOR

A dark serpentine line ran close and next to the baseboard in the hallway and was seen in both bedrooms. The appearance of this line was more noticeable from one direction over the opposite direction and would disappear when viewed directly overhead.

There was no crushing or matting noticed in the lines or adjacent yarns nor was there a difference in the size, bulk, twist, hue, or pile height of the yarns. Brushing the yarns would make the line disappear momentarily, but made no lasting change in the appearance. The line itself appeared to be border distinguishing different pile directions.

 

ON-LOCATION FIELD TESTING

A Pile Direction Test was done using a piece of paper and a pencil decisively indicated that the pile direction ran towards the baseboard on each side of the serpentine line.

 

THE ISSUE

The issue of this report is whether the fiber producer has responsibilities to this consumer for correcting the pile direction problem.

 

GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATING THE ISSUE

The fiber producer warranty and the CRI CLAIMS MANUAL are the applicable standards for this issue.

 

INDUSTRY STANDARDS & DEFINITIONS

According to the FLOOR COVERING DICTIONARY, it says this about shading.

SHADING - An optical effect cased by light reflection on the carpet pile giving the appearance of alternate lighter or darker areas. Examination will show that the tuft are actually of a uniform color and are restored to a one-color effect when the pile is smoothed in one direction. This characteristic is most notable in cut loop constructions, particularly pile carpets. In addition, in cut-pile fabrics, an apparent change in color when the pile is bent, caused by differences in the way light is reflected off the bent fibers. This phenomenon is a characteristic of pile fabrics, not a defect.

According to the CARPET AND RUG INSTITUTES's CLAIMS MANUAL, it says this about side matches.

Pile crushing, pile shading, and soiling are not manufacturing defects and will not be considered as a basis for claims. Claims for fuzzing and pilling will be subjected to examination and testing by the manufacturer. Claims for missing tufts will not be considered except on a basis of repair. No claims will be honored for carpet installed on stairs, in elevators and in bathrooms. The mill reserves the right to correct any repairable manufacturing defect. (See Glossary for definition of terms).

According to a study done by the CRI, on pooling they say this:

After a dense cut pile carpet is placed into service, some areas may start to appear to be lighter or darker in color. If the dyed yarns from these areas are compared with the original color, no change of color will be detected. These areas of perceived change may be in traffic or heavily used areas or in areas which receive only a small amount of use. The areas may be as small as a coin, or they may be very large. Normally, the extremities of the areas are rounded, and the rows of tufts between the two areas stand almost erect.

 

THE INSPECTOR'S ANALYSIS

This is a classic case of the condition known as pooling, shading, watermarking, or shore lining. It is a permanent change in the pile directions of which there are no lasting corrections. The forces that create it have no consensus of the cause, but two common factors are:

  1. it does happen more often on plush, dense pile carpet
  2. It is location specific.

Tests have been performed by replacing the carpet in areas where this condition has occurred and the results have been the same. For that reason, it is not considered a manufacturing defect, but there would be a less likely chance of occurrence with less plush and/or with a loop-pile carpet.

 

CONCLUSION

The fiber producer has no responsibility on this type claim based upon industry standards and practices and there is no defect to note in this carpet with respect to materials and construction.